<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lifestyle Lenses.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nickonken.com/blog/2008/05/lifestyle-lenses.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nickonken.com/blog/2008/05/lifestyle-lenses.html</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 05:15:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: abraham</title>
		<link>http://nickonken.com/blog/2008/05/lifestyle-lenses.html/comment-page-1#comment-652</link>
		<dc:creator>abraham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 14:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://205.186.128.244/blog/2008/05/lifestyle-lenses.html#comment-652</guid>
		<description>your images are very inspirational. thank you for sharing all the useful info!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your images are very inspirational. thank you for sharing all the useful info!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickonken</title>
		<link>http://nickonken.com/blog/2008/05/lifestyle-lenses.html/comment-page-1#comment-651</link>
		<dc:creator>nickonken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 11:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://205.186.128.244/blog/2008/05/lifestyle-lenses.html#comment-651</guid>
		<description>@Gustav You&#039;re right. Thanks for catching that. I grabbed the wrong photo. I changed it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Gustav You&#8217;re right. Thanks for catching that. I grabbed the wrong photo. I changed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gustav</title>
		<link>http://nickonken.com/blog/2008/05/lifestyle-lenses.html/comment-page-1#comment-650</link>
		<dc:creator>gustav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 09:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://205.186.128.244/blog/2008/05/lifestyle-lenses.html#comment-650</guid>
		<description>According to metadata the black&amp;white picture is shot at 200mm. Is it the 70-200?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to metadata the black&#038;white picture is shot at 200mm. Is it the 70-200?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carson</title>
		<link>http://nickonken.com/blog/2008/05/lifestyle-lenses.html/comment-page-1#comment-649</link>
		<dc:creator>Carson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 21:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://205.186.128.244/blog/2008/05/lifestyle-lenses.html#comment-649</guid>
		<description>thanks for the low down on your lens choices. I always learn so much on your blog.
Cheers.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the low down on your lens choices. I always learn so much on your blog.<br />
Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Egan</title>
		<link>http://nickonken.com/blog/2008/05/lifestyle-lenses.html/comment-page-1#comment-648</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Egan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 20:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://205.186.128.244/blog/2008/05/lifestyle-lenses.html#comment-648</guid>
		<description>Very good info my friend.  WOOT for the 35!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good info my friend.  WOOT for the 35!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzanne</title>
		<link>http://nickonken.com/blog/2008/05/lifestyle-lenses.html/comment-page-1#comment-647</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 12:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://205.186.128.244/blog/2008/05/lifestyle-lenses.html#comment-647</guid>
		<description>thank you!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Sledd</title>
		<link>http://nickonken.com/blog/2008/05/lifestyle-lenses.html/comment-page-1#comment-646</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Sledd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 10:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://205.186.128.244/blog/2008/05/lifestyle-lenses.html#comment-646</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this great post! I also shoot with prime lenses. I&#039;ve never tried the 35mm but it sounds like it would be a great addition to my lenses. I use the 50mm 1.2 all the time, but it is never really quite wide enough. Again thanks for a great post.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this great post! I also shoot with prime lenses. I&#8217;ve never tried the 35mm but it sounds like it would be a great addition to my lenses. I use the 50mm 1.2 all the time, but it is never really quite wide enough. Again thanks for a great post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickonken</title>
		<link>http://nickonken.com/blog/2008/05/lifestyle-lenses.html/comment-page-1#comment-645</link>
		<dc:creator>nickonken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 04:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://205.186.128.244/blog/2008/05/lifestyle-lenses.html#comment-645</guid>
		<description>@Suzanne You get a bit of distortion, but not too much. That&#039;s why I use it dynamically. The 20mm has a great dynamic to it without looking too &quot;wide angle&quot; distorted..
@Zach Yeah i&#039;ve had that problem, but I find myself shooting less and less from 1.2-2.0. I think if you have a UV filter or on it, it could help taking it off. It&#039;s usually really hard to have exact focus at that aperture. I&#039;ve found myself shooting f2.8-4 a lot more lately. It&#039;s a bit safer.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Suzanne You get a bit of distortion, but not too much. That&#8217;s why I use it dynamically. The 20mm has a great dynamic to it without looking too &#8220;wide angle&#8221; distorted..<br />
@Zach Yeah i&#8217;ve had that problem, but I find myself shooting less and less from 1.2-2.0. I think if you have a UV filter or on it, it could help taking it off. It&#8217;s usually really hard to have exact focus at that aperture. I&#8217;ve found myself shooting f2.8-4 a lot more lately. It&#8217;s a bit safer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://nickonken.com/blog/2008/05/lifestyle-lenses.html/comment-page-1#comment-644</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 02:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://205.186.128.244/blog/2008/05/lifestyle-lenses.html#comment-644</guid>
		<description>Loved this post Nick, thanks very much.  I use the 35L religiously and the 85L a lot too. I gotta say though, I&#039;ve tried everything from recalibration to focus screens and getting that thing in focus from 1.2-2.0 or so is almost maddening sometimes. Do you deal with this?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved this post Nick, thanks very much.  I use the 35L religiously and the 85L a lot too. I gotta say though, I&#8217;ve tried everything from recalibration to focus screens and getting that thing in focus from 1.2-2.0 or so is almost maddening sometimes. Do you deal with this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Solar</title>
		<link>http://nickonken.com/blog/2008/05/lifestyle-lenses.html/comment-page-1#comment-643</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Solar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 21:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://205.186.128.244/blog/2008/05/lifestyle-lenses.html#comment-643</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info!  I love how you post your amazing images, and give us other photogs a little glimpse into how you work.  It&#039;s greatly appreciated:)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info!  I love how you post your amazing images, and give us other photogs a little glimpse into how you work.  It&#8217;s greatly appreciated:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

